Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwest Airport Services (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to James R. Bath. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James R. Bath was closed "keep" (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:44, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Southwest Airport Services[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability. Fails WP:CORP. No consensus on the last AfD when the notability was for overcharging the government. If that establishes notability then every government contractor is notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep/merge A little bit notable. Google search yields nothing except the website, directories, and blogs. But Google news reveals a small amount of significant coverage, such as this article from TIME and this Associated Press article from the Dallas Morning News. However, none of the news in those references actually appears in the article as currently written. Consider merging to James R. Bath. --MelanieN (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've put James R. Bath up for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James R. Bath. If it is not deleted then this should be merged to his article; otherwise I would say Delete as whatever scandal is there is the only real claim to notability. Mangoe (talk) 02:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment. The fate of this article (merge or delete) may depend on the result of this AFD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.